Over the last decades farming has undergone deep technological changes in an unprecedent way. What just some years ago seemed to be science fiction, it has now become commonplace. Sensors beneath the soil can analyze roots affected by deseases hidden from human eyes and sending data to drones which can in turn pinpoint the hit plants and take actions in order to avoid a potential disaster. Computer and Artificial Intelligence are more and more gaining importance in agriculture, so that along the traditional tools, like tractors, fertilizers and harvesting machines, farmers can rely on high-tech as well to increase crops production.
Despite all those outstanding improvements, millions are still suffering from malnutrition and in some underdeveloped countries have to face up to drought and famine. This essay will briefly outline the most praobable causes of this issue and propose some solutions to tackle the problem.
Population growth plays has always been a major concern among scientists and governments. Nowadays, farming is taking on the challenge of feeding up to eight billion individuals. Not every country has reached high standard levels of life and some extremely poor nations in Africa or Asia are plagued by backwardness and lack of natural resources. Furthermore, climate change caused by pollution and the green house effect have made it difficult to cultivate soils properly, since large areas of fertile ground have been devastated by extreme heat or deforestation.
On the other hand, in some developed countries we are witnessing an incredible waste of resources and food as well. Actions should be taken in order to cut down on throwing away food which can be given to the needy for free. In addition to this, rich countries should also support developing nations by providing oversee aids and sending high qualified personell who could use their expertise to teach local workforce.
T conclude, I beleive that developed countries should take a major effort when it comes to helping poor nations to develope their own farming industry. At a time when increasing productivity has become a priority, the current technology could be the key to successfully accomplish the challenge of feeding a whole planet. To avoid a potential humanitarian catastrophe caused by lack of food, rapid actions should be taken.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, furthermore, if, so, still, well, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31182795699 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91405784918 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.79000886 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106648894959 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313330304963 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381023277949 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0584541759046 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360090240409 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, furthermore, if, so, still, well, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31182795699 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91405784918 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.79000886 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106648894959 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313330304963 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381023277949 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0584541759046 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360090240409 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.