Students in school should learn practical skills like car maintenance and managing a bank account in addition to academic subjects. Do you agree or disagree
There is an ongoing debate whether children’s school should focus only into theoretical knowledge or on both practice as well as theoretical aspects. In my opinion, the merits of gaining knowledge in both academic suburbs and practical skills outweigh the disadvantages.
Undoubtedly, if practical skills such as account and maintaining car is being taught at school than students might get diverted from their academic knowledge. This in turns results into lowering their academic grades. Moreover, the lower marks in theory subject will not allow them to get a good job in high-profile company or get admission in renowned college for perusing further qualification.
Nevertheless, the advantages associated with learning on-field skills cannot be overlooked. Firstly, in later age that is after the academic years the practical aspects are more useful than the theoretical knowledge. As theory only provides with the information, however the practical skills are more involved in day-to-day routine. For example, if a person’s car get stopped in middle of nowhere and does not find any body to help than at that moment the basic skills for car maintenance aids then to reach nearby garage for further repairing of car.
Moreover, people lack confidence if they are deprived of any practical experience. Gaining practical skills allow children to relate with the theoretical knowledge. This improves their understanding about the theory subjects and directly boost their confidence. The feature helps them be different from others and lead them toward success.
To recapitulate, although gaining theoretical knowledge is essential for getting good grades in academics. The practical experience builds confidence and also give good insight about the theory subjects which push them towards the path of success in life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...eoretical knowledge or on both practice as well as theoretical aspects. In my opinion, the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts. In my opinion, the merits of gaining knowledge in both academic suburbs and p...
^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anybody'?
Suggestion: anybody
... in middle of nowhere and does not find any body to help than at that moment the basic s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple lack confidence if they are deprived of any practical experience. Gaining pra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, well, for example, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60215053763 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95557911419 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584229390681 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8825786953 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.2 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186135661152 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615721732012 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564565952192 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985011715104 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513028819242 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.