Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Some are of the opinion that offline education is more effective than distance-learning from home. I totally agree because studying by themselves students easily get distracted and do not have positive social interactions, which enhance the learning process as well.
On the one hand, somebody can argue that online classes are a modern and convenient way of learning. However, despite the comfortable home environment children constantly get distracted and bored. This is because the Internet contains much more appealing content than school subjects. If a student is not understanding the learning material, most likely they will leave it aside and start surfing the web or play computer games instead. In addition, the youth tend to copy assignments and answers from the web as well. For instance, my younger brother studying in the comfort of home used to play “Arcade” through the network with his classmates and his grades deteriorated rapidly.
On the other hand, spending time with peers at school, students not only gain knowledge more efficiently but also learn how to communicate and resolve conflicts in a constructive way. While a teacher organizes the structure of a lesson and looks after the discipline in a class. Moreover, a teacher is a role model for the youngsters and can timely give a valuable piece of advice if a student is struggling with a task. To illustrate, when I had an issue with my academic performance in primary school, my teacher took immediate action and helped me to improve it.
In conclusion, I completely agree that studying offline is more beneficial than online education. This is because this way an average child will learn more in terms of formal subjects and social skills as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...tent than school subjects. If a student is not understanding the learning material, most likely they...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a constructive way" with adverb for "constructive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ow to communicate and resolve conflicts in a constructive way. While a teacher organizes the structur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15845070423 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90242316114 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616197183099 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4399400693 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.642857143 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238282754098 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750073782444 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556468068234 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142564614218 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255360424903 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.