Sugar consumption is too harmful. Some say it is governments responsibility to limit sugar intake, while others say it's individual who are responsible.Discuss both the views and give your own opinion.

Undoubtedly, sugar is one of the vital ingredients used in preparation of most of our foods. However, it is beneficial for human body if consumed in a limited quantity, but, its over intake can deteriorate health of consumer. Certain people states that it is government's duty to put restrictions on sugar distribution while others reckon that it is solely the individuals' responsibility. This essay will discuss both the views in details and provide evidence as to why folks are accountable for limiting this.
Some people opine that in order to keep its people fit and healthy, government bodies should take a drastic step for minimizing this intake. It should impose laws on the food manufacturing units to keep the sugar quantity as low as it can be in that particular item since general public is unaware of the right amount that can be taken. For instance, in India, there are a plethora of food plants which uses a huge quantity of sugar in its food like soft drinks, chocolates, et cetera. This is because of no regular check on the premises. As a result, health of people deteriorates to a greater extent. Thus, authorities should pose laws among the food manufacturers.
On the other hand, another bunch of people says that individuals are responsible for their health by themselves only because merely they can reduce this intake through their eating habits. Also, they should have a look on how much sugar is considered to be fine for a fit body and its proportion mentioned on every food article. That is why; people themselves should take responsibility for being in fitness.
In conclusion, there are different perceptions made by different people in order to tackle this issue. However, in my opinion, individuals should take up a stand for themselves to become disease free.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ile others reckon that it is solely the individuals responsibility. This essay will discuss...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...it can be in that particular item since general public is unaware of the right amount that can...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, thus, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94039735099 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85759862787 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562913907285 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1264806509 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158123039594 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493019498965 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459444470472 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964190475395 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540717084149 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.