Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. Given time, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Analyze both sides of this argument.
In today's world use of technology is ever-increasing. Even in classrooms this can be seen pretty eminently. The argument that technology will replace teachers in the classroom has both point views, in support as well as refuted. In following few lines we will analyze both sides before drawing any reasoned conclusion.
Firstly, it is easy to observe that technology is making in roads by leaps and bounds in order to mimic physical and mental capabilities of human beings. For example, the Honda robot Asimov can move his body and move things with precision. Therefore the possibilities of robotic teachers has become plausible outcome given time. Due to this the claim of replacement of human teachers by technology has garnered support.
However, on the other side of this argument it must be remembered that a teacher powered by artificial intelligence has little or virtually no control over students. For instance, as we all know for a fact that students need a watchfull eye in order to be disciplined during class time. Unfortunately this is something that a robot teacher simply cannot provide. Thus this makes it clear that technology will never be able to replace human teachers completely.
To recapitulate, both sides of the arguments regarding the possibility of technology driven classes have strong support. However, after analyzing both the camps, it is evident that the idea of technology replacing human teachers in classroom completely cannot be supported as it has more negatives than positives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ssroom has both point views, in support as well as refuted. In following few lines we will...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...is body and move things with precision. Therefore the possibilities of robotic teachers h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... a robot teacher simply cannot provide. Thus this makes it clear that technology wil...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25409836066 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94606857952 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590163934426 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3025937764 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5714285714 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469834343503 0.244688304435 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1537736723 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937262358244 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282224263161 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885957279904 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.