Television dominates the free-time for too many people. It can make people lazy and prevent them from socialising with others. Do you agree or disagree?
Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
The world is now a global village and socialization has evolved from physical contact to virtual communications. Arguably, television may be assumed to raise the level of laziness and interaction among the people. I do not agree with this assertion because television encourages learning and helps in relaxing.
Information is power and television promotes knowing happening around the world. Different programs are being aired on the television ranging from news, movies, sports, religious activities and so on. This programs are targeted towards different segment of the society. For example, it is generally known that men loves watching football and women are more attracted to stations showing love films such as zeeworld. Innate skills can also be developed in the process , example is food channel that teaches different cooking techniques or football techniques been learned by watching football channels.
In addition, the populace socialises via chats on different social platforms and not television. With the advent of mobile phones, people tend to communicate with their phone as against the traditional method as this is more convenient and a faster means of communication. In recent times, people are becoming idle due to addiction to their mobile phone while on the road, at school, at work or even at religious places. This is one of the reasons for laziness among the public.
In conclusion, television helps people relax after a long days work and new skills can also be learned online. It is generally suggested that television reduces productivity and communication among the people. In my opinion, I think television helps people know about happenings around the world and it does not discourage socializatio
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'station'.
Suggestion: station
...ootball and women are more attracted to stations showing love films such as zeeworld. In...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lls can also be developed in the process , example is food channel that teaches di...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41697416974 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91302705851 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605166051661 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2121191259 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160537376797 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526869427824 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335073549755 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954854236379 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237438569961 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.