These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas, in the past, people used to repair damaged things and keep them for a long time.
Explain why you think this change has happened. What are the effects of this change in attitude?
In this era of urbanization, it has been noticed that there is a tremendous change in the tastes and preferences of people around the globe. Nowadays, people are replacing old items with new ones, rather than maintaining or getting them repaired. This essay will discuss the dynamic change in the attitude of people and its effects thereon.
Let's begin by looking at the reasons for this transformation. In the current scenario, because of this fast-paced life, Individuals prefer to invest their time in productive things rather than wasting time in getting old or damaged things repaired. Hence, they always choose to get things replaced with new ones.
Secondly, there is no denying the fact that labor cost has become more expensive as in the past. As a result, preserving old items involves high maintenance costs. Therefore, in spite of repairing old items, buying new items is preferable.
Turning to the other side of the argument, this trend has led to the detachment of human beings from their ancestral memories. Moreover, our offsprings would not get any glimpse of our family's history.
Another issue is that this change might be beneficial for companies manufacturing new products but on the other hand it is highly contributing to the national wastage.
To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that this trend is supporting big corporates making huge profits but people should not chase new trends by sacrificing the memories of their ancestral items.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...e of people and its effects thereon. Lets begin by looking at the reasons for thi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17355371901 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74809233372 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628099173554 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.82511133 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3076923077 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242962627203 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077538083626 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683040611084 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106734760822 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789946671812 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.