It is true that nuclear power has threaten our world in world wars one and two, and the consequence had proved it was a disaster. However, it has known that nuclear power can produce a clean and efficient energy that provides less air pollution to the earth. Although, there are several drawbacks on using this dangerous resource, I believe that there are more beneficial technology can promote it as a powerful energy.
Many people argue that nuclear power is an unpredictable bomb and it will cause seriously catastrophe of radiation. The nuclear power function vital cancerous radiation when this wastes is released, the huge amount of people or countries will be destroying by this dangerous threat. For example, the Chernobyl disaster, the reactor explosion had caused numerous of employees and residents suffered by radioactive contamination as well as the whole area had been abundant about 30 years till now.
However, there are several drawbacks on using nuclear power, I still believe this has it benefit to the country. Scientists have proved that nuclear power is value in produce huge power within minimum pollution, and it’s cheap to purchase the materials. Many countries are depended on burning coal or gas to produce their energy and the emission of carbon dioxide caused the air pollution which lead to the Green house effect. Moreover, the limited of energy materials cause of price increasingly, in addition it had impacted the environmental damage by over mining. Nuclear power is more environmental friendly if we are carefully maintaining the whole systems of radiator plant.
In conclusion, although there is still a lot improvement in using nuclear power as an alternative power, but for environmental friendly, I would strongly suggest this technology outweigh it disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'threatened'.
Suggestion: threatened
It is true that nuclear power has threaten our world in world wars one and two, an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'benefits'?
Suggestion: benefits
...lear power, I still believe this has it benefit to the country. Scientists have proved ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mited of energy materials cause of price increasingly, in addition it had impacte...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32291666667 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88755102234 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5149538247 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314363815946 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120688078918 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762735166352 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195114254386 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509697206446 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.