Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic.
What are the benefits and disadvantages of tourists who visit such places?
The reason behind, people traveling from one place to another in the old-fashioned times, would be, for recreation and spending some alone-time with their families. Hence, the destinations chosen by them would preferably include beaches, boating, and parks. Nowadays, tourists in the modern world seem to be more adventurous. Beyond fun, one needs an enthralling experience, when they visit new places. Although the destinations such as Sahara, The Antarctic or the Amazon forest are extremely unsafe and riskier, their happiness knew no bounds, when they visit these places and boast about them, on their return.
Apart from these thrilling experiences gained by someone, visiting these places brings relaxation and comfort in one’s life as these places become fewer populated zones. One can enjoy the utmost happiness amidst the traffic congestion and stress, faced in their everyday life.
In spite of all these thrilling experiences, one must realize the difficulties and drawbacks of visiting these places. Several reasons are lined up, for it’s quite a risky venture for anyone visiting these places. First of all, there can occur a medical emergency situation anytime and no such facility is ensured in such places. Secondly, food and water supplies are needed for the basic survival of a man. It’s not that easy to find a food shop nearby, as these places do not expect frequent visitors. So, we need to keep the food and water always in reserve, when we go to such places because of the shortage. Finally, these places are not apt for a vacation with families, as one may need long hours of travel, which may even take several weeks or months to explore to gain experience.
In conclusion, although, traveling to places like Sahara, Antarctic and Amazon are quite a nail-biting experience, it involves a lot of risk management, which becomes a question of one’s own survival.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'water'.
Suggestion: always water
...itors. So, we need to keep the food and water always in reserve, when we go to such places b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, apart from, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21428571429 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68384565353 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603896103896 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7503369751 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.066666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193798913567 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630060531008 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046163151625 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111080872716 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416396531474 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.