Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara Desert or the Antarctic?
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
It is an irrefutable fact that tourist industries have been grown rapidly in recent years. Especially, people prefer arduous places as it offers more opportunities and enjoyment during exploring but, it has drawbacks too. In this essay I will discuss pros and cons of visiting hurdler places.
One advantages of visiting place this kind of place is natural beauty and cannot be seen anywhere in the world. Certain gigantic landscapes are unique and have breathtaking scenery such as Sahara Desert and Antarctic. However, individual has to deal with rough terrain. As an example of this scenario is, one New Zealand explorer Edmund Hillary, after climbing the highest peak on the earth, Mount Everest, describes in an interview with National Geography about watching the globe from the acme point with his eyes. Thus, it is evident that there are number of places which doesn’t allow regular family tourism.
On the other hand, venturing wild places is the most dangerous for life. The reason for this is, wild places such as the Amazon forest contains venomous insects which might threat the rookie adventurers and visitors. For instance, Bear Grylls who is surviving in Kanha forest in India, while he touched a poisonous frog that spread poison by touching skin. Ultimately, he survived from the incident but he suffered skin irritation for a long time as he described in his book. Hence, it is not easy to see such kind of maps.
In conclusion, there are some negative points to visit extremely dangerous places. This location might risk with lives sometimes but memories might leave an impression on your brain for a long duration. Many companies also organize difficult sites tourism to see beauty on the earth.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07042253521 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52974763379 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661971830986 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7704872161 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229791956451 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648052138902 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044621392386 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117492707362 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320401544187 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.