Today, people can work and live anywhere they want, because of the improvement of communication technology and transport. Do advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Advancement in technology and transport has made it possible for people to live and work in any part of the globe. In my opinion, these developments open-up the gate for innumerable occupation prospects for aspiring candidates and provided unbeatable mobility to work from home to many individuals.
To begin with technological innovations, it has become quite possible for several individuals to work from home. In other words, the presence of computers and the internet allowed employees to work efficiently from the convenience of their home without requiring to go to the office every day, and this has lifted their long commuting hours, which can be used for achieving their required office assignment. Furthermore, in the case of a pandemic situation, an employee can linger at home and work without having a need to leave the home. For instance, In the Covid-19 pandemic situation, most of the employees are operating from their home and working quite efficiently
On the other hand, having an ameliorated transport infrastructure has provided a safe and rapid way of travelling to their offices, and people can now work far off from their native places rather than moving there physically. For instance, The metro services in Delhi-NCR are proved to be a breakthrough for many people who can now up-down daily for work.
In conclusion, as a result of an improved transport system and technological breakthroughs like the internet and personal computers, people can stay any part of the world and still have a flourishing career in a prestigious multinational company, and travel one to another in less time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'going', 'gonna'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: going; gonna
...enience of their home without requiring to go to the office every day, and this has l...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le who can now up-down daily for work. In conclusion, as a result of an improve...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20992366412 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03703851423 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545801526718 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.6474222223 49.4020404114 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.625 106.682146367 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.75 20.7667163134 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.625 7.06120827912 235% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171126561754 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890174792809 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472966847826 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114354702447 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224821499747 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.0946893788 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.