Topic: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Riding a car has long been efficient and convenient since cars were invented. People can drive it everywhere; no matter where and when you are, you can just hop into a car and immediately hit the road. However, I agree with the statement that twenty years later, the usage of car will probably diminish compared to current times. How is that if cars have such a long history and are said to be useful?
First, with the population booming and people moving into cities, it may sound like the number of cars will surge up. Yet, it is likely that the streets can be heavily crowded if everybody drives one car when transporting. Nowadays, as I have observed during daily periods in which people commute, the issue has already gotten more severe and in crucial need of being resolved. Sometimes, if there is heavy traffic, driving a car can be much of a time-consuming and grinding process as drivers wait amid huge packs of cars. Therefore, incentives of families and commuters to drive cars will possibly decline, causing more people turning to public transportation.
Moreover, urban development and gradually denser communities can lead to less land for parking spaces, which has become a major concern for car owners. They will either have harder times finding parking spots or pay for higher fees to rent one, if ever possible. This will decrease people’s incentive for driving cars as well.
Most importantly, over the course of time, people have conceived and created more diverse ways of transport, from horse carriages and the earliest cars to high speed rails and airplanes. In movies, we have also seen people’s imagination on future transportation, for example, personal aircrafts or even roller shoes that can help people move more quickly without effort. So, we can easily infer that people will surely come up with faster and more suitable means of transportation, which will fit more into the future society, and then make them into trends, eventually replacing cars on the road.
In conclusion, I think that as long as technology advances and human population continues to drastically shift and grow, there will surely be fewer cars in use.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97513812155 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64063112824 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613259668508 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7079014206 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5625 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226910840551 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846380773786 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669549434758 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141784744049 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812078034805 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.