tt is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful. Architects shouldn't worry about producing a building as a work of art. Do you agree or disagree?
Understandably, the utility of the building is more relevant than its beauty. I, total disagree with the statement that architects should not make efforts in making artistic buildings. I believe that today’s architects have both capability and resources to make the building both beautiful and useful.
A good building should satisfy the three principles; durability, utility and beauty. It must be robust and stand in good condition. Those building should serve the purpose and function well for those using it. It should delight the people and raise their spirit. An excellent architect should strive to fulfil all the attributes as much as possible.
To begin with, the burgeoning of the population has raised the debate concerning whether the building should only serve the purpose and not the beauty. However, the skyscrapers serve both the purpose. These can accommodate more people with the least space, and these skyscrapers are an architectural marvel in terms of beauty.
Secondly, natural resources are limited, and it is the need of the hour to check the usage and make energy-efficient buildings. For instance, the use of solar panel and other energy-saving methods is the need of the day. Today’s architects are making marvellous efforts to make such solar panels aesthetically appealing and which need less space. The climate is changing due to global warming; the need for a building which remains cool without the use of airconditioning is a factor which modern constructions are taking care of.
To summarise, it is imperative to understand the function and aesthetics as well, and today the architects are capable of incorporating both in their architectural marvels.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34701492537 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00230799687 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529850746269 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5431386766 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5625 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18632775726 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618986259354 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552295140972 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100127576297 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054920858328 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.