Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is advised that rich nations accept more refugees to come in and offer them with necessity things such as food and shelter. I completely agree with the above said notion because prosperous nations can have the capability to fulfil their needs and refugees can also find employment easily.
To begin with the topic, wealthy nations have the enough ability to accomplish the needs of refugees. Owing to this, proponents recommend that they should adopt more refugees in their area. Developed countries have a support of various people organisations such as WHO which allow them lots of fund to help needy people according to their economic growth. Hence, they can use this money to give facilities to these people. To exemplify this, recently, WHO organisation issued 1 million funds to Canada Government according to their economic growth to help helpless people.
Along With this, prosperous countries have lots of job opportunities. These nations have numerous industries and other various bands which are famous on world-wide. Further, every year they open 10 lac jobs in their nation. Therefore, if they adopt refugees then refugees can also get jobs related to their skills, and they can start their new career. For Instance, recently, Norway which is top most in the 2019 developed nation list accept 1 lakh refugees, and provide them jobs in their organisations and industries according to their education qualification. After taking interview from these adopted people, they mention that Norway government aid them a lot to carry on a new life.
In conclusion, not only wealthy countries afford their expenditure but also they can provide jobs according to their skills. Hence, I completely agree with the proponents who support that view-point that developed countries should host adequate refugees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d them a lot to carry on a new life. In conclusion, not only wealthy countrie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32871972318 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6705182053 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536332179931 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4835220251 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172497814302 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678442645921 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630392658934 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132235248296 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488482994024 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.