Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that, wealthy nations should allow more refugees and aid them with minimum needs like food, shelter. I agree with this statement because rich countries have enough resources to sustain lives of poor and even if we look at the other aspect, they have moral reasons to support the needy.
The main reason developed countries should take charge in helping displaced people because of abundant resources. Moreover, they have the stamina to accept the families effected by wars and natural calamities. This is possible for the nations like US, UK and other countries because they have huge budget from the tax payers which can be used for adopting refugees from vanished nations. For example, In the recent days most of the Caribbean nations have been destroyed by floods, by which people are seeking for helping hands.
Wealthy nations can also look at the morality aspect to provide at-least the basic needs for their survival. Moreover, it is an unexpected situation because no one wants to lead to situations pleading for other countries help by leaving their home nations. They will be in danger of losing their lives if in-case no country is allowing them. For example, the people from Syria has suffered a lot wavering in need of food at their war environment.
In conclusion, the rich countries need to offer resettlement for refugees as they have potential to help them in supplying food and roof to place their head. It is not at all fair to reject them with only reason that they are from foreign nations. This is not a very big deal for economically grown nations as they have high financial and resource treasures.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90322580645 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43111174945 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6313828136 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.230769231 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154471991315 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644932144184 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592003615376 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110834114798 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528620964858 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.