In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, health problems are increasing due to excessive consumption of junk food; therefore, many are ending up their life with perilous health issues like obesity, liver related challenges and many others. However, many argue that government should charge higher tax rates on junk food products; so, that there will be a decrease in purchase of these food items. In my opinion, this is not a solution to this problem.
Further, to the increase in the tax rates will make fast foods un-affordable only to the poor and middle-class people. This will force them to cook their food at the home instead of bearing those heavier taxes. This results in consuming healthy food thereby, improves appetite. But, the raise in tax will not discourage affluent consumers from buying fast food; moreover, many are reluctant to cook food by their own because of busy work schedule and even more they got habituated to eat junk. With the increase in online food services at affordable price, most of the people in cities show interest towards the food offers and relay on these.
On the other hand, instead of increasing the tax rates government should bring awareness among society about ill-effects of junk and packed food on everyone’s health. Perhaps, it is better to make healthy food more affordable and accessible. The main reason for increasing consumption of fast food is that, it can be cooked in few minutes and looks delicious. Although, many know that it is hazardous to health, they opt for it because healthier alternatives are not conveniently available.
In conclusion, increasing the tax on fast foods will only deter the low-income groups from buying them where others will be at risk. If the government really wants to cut the consumption of fast food and save the sufferers, it should offer the healthier food at affordable price and bring awareness among the crowd. As we all know that ‘Health is wealth’; so, reduce intake of junk for maximal happiness.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, really, so, therefore, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06707317073 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7262303544 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542682926829 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0228649245 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295173437478 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110262716294 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330256530356 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196609145366 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213157580013 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.