While some people consider global warming to be the most pressing environmental problem which we have at the moment, others believe that deforestation has a more devastating impact on our world.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Climate change is often at the top of the agenda throughout. It is often argued by some that the rise in temperature of the atmosphere is the top concern because of floods. Meanwhile, others still claim that the forest cutting at large scale is causing air pollution that needs to be addressed. This essay will explore both sides of the argument before reaching a logical opinion.
On the one hand, the supporter of the idea that global warming is responsible for environmental hazards believes that glacier melting causes excessive floods. As the temperature of the atmosphere rises due to greenhouse gases, the icebergs start to melt. Take an example of a recent flood in China as a result of glacial mass melting in the Himalayas, due to which a large proportion of human beings, livestock, and agriculture were lost. Thus, heating of the globe causes devastation on a large scale.
While, on the other hand, the advocates of the view that tree cutting has been adversely affecting the climate believe that the amount of carbon dioxide in the air increases because of this phenomenon. As trees act as an absorber of carbon dioxide, forest cutting causes the demise of this barrier. Take an example of India, a leading country in the carbon footprint, where lung diseases are more prevalent due to the fact that only 5% of the land is covered with trees. Hence, unnecessary logging is the cause of contamination of air with poisonous gas.
Whereas, I believe that both act as a fueling force behind environmental problems. As global warming is causing a rise in water level, which affect the population, while augmenting the level of carbon in the air due to lack of trees acts as a slow poison for human beings.
To sum up, from my perspective the combination of variation in atmospheric temperature and deforestation is badly affecting the environment through flooding and rising health issues due to air pollution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, so, still, thus, whereas, while, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97846153846 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78260701055 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544615384615 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1430841581 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.866666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140645598295 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451991475612 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359675455877 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0743706660531 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351968418668 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.