The world would be a better place if women own leadership. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Leading the world needs a lot of qualities, confidence, and strong decision-making ability. Though some people hold an opinion that females are more suitable as politicians as they are capable to make the globe a better home to live in, yet, I assert that leadership has nothing to do with gender and civilians should consider the qualities of the candidate while voting.
Primarily, we are living in a democracy and all the rights cannot be given to one gender only as it will create a lot of conflicts. Mother nature never differentiates between genders because she never says that my fruits are for females only or vice-versa and hence we also should not do partiality on the sex basis. Moreover, most females are emotional in nature and they take decisions emotionally which can be an issue in the future.
Secondly, a leader has a lot of responsibilities and therefore it requires a lot of education ad qualities. A king should be confident and must have strong decision power. Leaders should be able to protect their residents from all the problems such as health issues, wealth issues, and should be able to provide them safety and security. Then only a world can become a safe place for all and clearly, any gender can do this.
In contrast, there are some people who would disagree with my opinion because they believe that if women are good homemakers then they can make the world a better place. Such people think emotionally as they see their sisters and mothers in all the females. I really wonder why they don’t see their fathers or brothers in all men. Apparently, I would like to say that these people need to think out of the gender boxes and should choose the right candidate whether male or female.
In conclusion, while some critics praise a woman for her emotional and motherly qualities, yet, I still stick to my opinion that leading the world is not a joke and a person whether a man or a woman must possess the required qualities that are necessary to improve the system.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, hence, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74857142857 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62400846191 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531428571429 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.1672278459 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171677256668 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545642556234 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618830241095 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858471609347 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417458533898 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.