Young drivers are careless and overconfidence and too many are killed in accidents. To eliminate this problem, we could teach children the skills of safe driving while they are at school. To what extent are you agree or disagree?
Safety is the cheap and best effective insurance policy. Nevertheless, there are some irrevocable issues related to safety when young drivers drive carelessly. The given topic asserts that killing in accidents is increased as young drivers are careless and overconfident. It is neccessary to teach children about safe driving at school. However, I am not totally agree with this.
To begin with, there is a group of people who believe that the skills of safe driving should teach in schools. The first and foremost reason for this is that pupils have young mind. So, all rules and regulations can be taught to the children and they will understand them well too. The second reason is that teenagers has lots of enthusiasm and energy. So, it is better to control their energy by telling them the negative effects of reckless driving. Moreover, all the teaching in the childhood imprint in pupils' mind.
Moving further, there is another group of people who think that it is not useful to teach skills of safe driving at school. The main reason for this is that young children goes to school for their studies. In present times, children has lots of pressure of studies as there is cut throat competition among students. So, lots of time required to make them understand all rules and regulations of safe driving and it will have bad effect on their academic performance.
In conclusion, there are variety of factors that have led to make this subject of careless driving more worse. But, I tend to believe that schools should run weekly or bimonthly safe driving awareness program for teenagers. It will not imapct their studies too. Moreover, students will understand the value of life with these programs and try to avoid lose their invaluable life for the sake of fun.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ct of careless driving more worse. But, i tend to believe that schools should run...
^
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...fe with these programs and try to avoid loose their invaluable life for the sake of f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, thus, well, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91362126246 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4999685432 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521594684385 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.472547929 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8421052632 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8421052632 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262426103527 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808438385385 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690023434126 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168341282328 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640283061354 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.