Young people are often influenced by their peers. Do the advantages of peer pressure outweigh the disadvantages?
Humans are known to be social animal, who willingly or unwillingly tend to socialize with others aiming to initiate a relationship for exchange of traits. Most often, youngsters in school share a symbiotic relationship, which potentially affects their overall development in numerous ways. Debatably, a logical explanation of mutual trait exchange among students is quite subtle; however, simplified merits and demerits are detailed in forthcoming paragraphs.
Irrefutably, a companion’s influence plays a critical role in the overall development of child’s conscience and personality, while its positivity relies on the quality of fellowship. Moreover, since people improvise themselves being on the ground of friendly competency among peers, a student’s academics and communication capabilities are pivotally reliant on peers as well. This potentially portrays the need of an academically favorable companionship for a school-goer. The most basic categorization can vividly be based on the level of dominance.
Despite lucrative benefits of having an advantageous social circle in school, circumstantial factors hindering conscience may sometimes lead youngsters towards the bad company. While initial goal of majority of students is improvised grades, the highly dominant students have been observed to have forcibly influenced other students into off-goal activities like smoking, alcohol consumption etcetera. Moreover, peer pressure caused flunks have been vividly evident in most schools as an outcome of the symbiotically toxic friendships that children fall into.
Summing up, I believe that merits and demerits of peer influence is unconditionally dependent on the person’s choice of friends. Looking onto the solution, parents must find themselves responsible for keeping a check on their offspring’s company to ensure better upbringing, because the destructive possibilities of child’s career by dominant peers outweigh the potential benefits of a good amity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.07446808511 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30850303679 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677304964539 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0023828419 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.75 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167788473829 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520497207048 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496888528123 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930825330187 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496129748853 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.22 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.