2
In today's modern world, by progressing in economic, making money and all matters related to it is becoming more important than ever before. In this situation, people compete for having more money and its clystal clear that all of them can not grasp money equaly. As a result there are many people all over the world who need other's help to afford their costs. One controversial question arises in this regard weather the more money people have, the more they should give away to charity or not. Some people believe that who have more money should get away from charity but others beilive in opposite way. In my perspective, having more money should result in more participting in charity plans. I feel this way for some reasons which are pinpointed in the following.
To begin with, elites, who more influence society, have complicate life style. they are busy with their jobs, scaduling to invest to enhance their budget and many other things that other people may don't need to be worry about them. People in this circumstance require to seek for beneficial ways to release their mind and improve their feeling positively. Charity is an appropriate way for richs to kill birds with one stone: use thier money to help others and make their own moods better.
Additionaly, all charities are based on rich people's money and without them it will be imposibble to manage any charity. Therefore, members who work in charity companies use lots of ways to attract people to participate. So there are many people that are active in theses companies since it brings them positive results. To illustrate my point, these days charity celebrities apeals to most of the due to the fact they illustate how they are rich and genourouse in this way, moreover it results in popularity.
In a nutshell, by taking acoount all the above reasons and many others, i strongely believe that more money people have more interests to charity. Not only they can have more peacful life styles but also they can be more succesful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...all of them can not grasp money equaly. As a result there are many people all over...
^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'complicated'.
Suggestion: complicated
...lites, who more influence society, have complicate life style. they are busy with their jo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ce society, have complicate life style. they are busy with their jobs, scaduling to ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...many other things that other people may dont need to be worry about them. People in ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seeking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: seeking
...em. People in this circumstance require to seek for beneficial ways to release their mi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
... results. To illustrate my point, these days charity celebrities apeals to most of t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, i feel, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85755813953 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41405647661 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543604651163 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5715658809 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2941176471 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.