3. At one high school, more of its students than ever before have been caught cheating on their homework assignments. For example, many students have asked other students to provide them with answers for assignments. The school is considering making a change to help decrease the number of students who cheat on homework. Which one of the following actions do you think will be most effective and why?
1_Asking parents to monitor their children as they do their homework and confirm that their children have not cheated
2_Increasing the penalty for cheating
3_Asking teachers to create homework assignments that will make it more difficult for students to cheat
School plays an important role in any person’s life. Cheating is a significant problem with which schools are faced. In my opinion, preventing students from cheating by considering the much more penalty for cheating is a better option than monitoring them by their parents and giving them difficult assignments. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, raising penalties will be more instructive and inhibitor. To clarify, students who want to deceive their teachers would not do that since they will effectively know that their unfavorable behavior might hurt themselves more, so they may put an effort to understand deeply their lessons. This helpful effort will thrive in their instinctive abilities. Although schools can easily monitor students’ assignment by putting them on black-board systems, new advice display how the percentage of writing is the same as others, parents cannot pay attention twenty and four hours a day because most of the parents nowadays are really busy. For example, one of my friends was charged as a defrauder by collecting answers from his friends not only was he punished by depriving of attending his classes for one month but also his friends. As a result, he wishes he could not have deceived on his tutors. Other students seeing this strict punishment, having been changed from one week to four weeks, had not used other student’s answering. As time goes by, students motivated, and they accomplished their homework tasks on themselves.
The second reason which advocates my outlook is that raising penalty such as corporal punishment, which is a tough strategy, will be effectively prohibitive cheating method owing to students want to continue their studies, do not frustrate their parents, and put them in the hole. To elucidate, smart students relying on their parents will feel deeply ashamed of what they had done. Therefore, students will cease their cheating behavior, even if they commit repetitive cheating because of tougher punishment. They might have figured out that they would face a serious problem, and it is better for them to not defraud.
To sum up, schools have several options to solve their problems of preventing students from deceiving. I believe that developed punishment is the best choice. This is because it motives students and destroys ways of cheating and because rigid punishment leads to feelings of profound regret.
Comments
thank you so much! I am…
thank you so much! I am wondering what whitespace rule is.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hed their homework tasks on themselves. The second reason which advocates my out...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d it is better for them to not defraud. To sum up, schools have several options ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t leads to feelings of profound regret.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, really, second, so, therefore, for example, i feel, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20707070707 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70529396691 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573232323232 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.4389497803 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.526315789 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8421052632 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349083287651 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100831877952 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639629560189 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216152277711 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479673115028 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.