Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?

Sociologists take it as axiomatic that team working is one of the most momentous elements in every student’s life. At the present time, schools and universities endeavor to opt for the best approach to enhance students’ abilities as team projects. In my opinion, universities should evaluate students’ capability when they conduct group research alone. My reasons are substantiated in the subsequent paragraphs.
The first reason worth mentioning is that one grade for the group project will not show a person’s potential. To clarify, a contributed student might not do something special in group research, so it will be unfair. Take my own experience as an example. I vividly remember when I was attended my school, my math teacher gave my free eater classmate, who put force on me to prepare every essential material, and I a math group homework. Although I had to do every task, we get the same grade regarding our school’s policy. At that time, I was feeling that I was a slave. Doing that project just showed my ability, not my project mate. If we had the same capability, getting the same mark would be just.
Another key point that makes me hold this belief is that their innate capacity may not grow up since group grade convey a wrong message. The grading practices we choose affect students’ value. They can communicate a healthy message; the harder you try, the more you will learn, and, in turn, the best your grade will be. Consequently, students are not going to profoundly understand whether their hard-working is enough or not. Students, nonetheless, continue intrinsically this behave.
To arrive at conclusion, I firmly disagree with the idea that working in a group at university and receive the same grade is a good choice for assessment due to the fact that not only will the same mark present our merit precisely but also it possesses an adverse effect on pupils’ talent so that they cannot broaden their horizon.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: At
...ntous elements in every student’s life. at theA present time, schools and universi...
^^
Line 2, column 414, Rule ID: I_A[1]
Message: Did you mean 'am' (first person of "to be")?
Suggestion: am
...prepare every essential material, and I a math issue. Although I had to do every ...
^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to affect'
Suggestion: to affect
...essage. The grading practices we choose affect students’ value. They can communicate a...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 52.1666666667 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94801223242 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81942923877 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608562691131 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4750211536 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8888888889 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316734253478 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845021356967 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636492585739 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177695329024 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436035027353 0.0645574589148 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.