65. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To solve present and future problems, it is necessary to understand the past.
Throughout history, human beings have always sought methods to solve their problems. However, there are still numerous struggles yet to come that people have to face. In this regard, some people believe that for us to solve present and future problems, we should make a profound understanding of past events. I entirely agree with this statement. In what follows, I will elaborate on two reasons to substantiate my perspective.
To begin with, I contend that there are numerous fabulous experiences and useful knowledge that have been gained by people in the past. This immense source of wisdom can be used in today's world to overcome serious present and future problems. So, it goes without saying that people face an inordinate number of hurdles on large and small scales in our hectic world. Although many challenges in the modern world seem unprecedented, they have deep roots in common incentives that were familiar for ancient people. As a result, people should pay painstaking attention to past events and study their causes. It is only by studying history that people can access those pearls of wisdom and use them to solve present and anticipate future problems.
In addition, my conviction is that by reviewing past events gathered in extensive history resources, we can prevent many mistakes from happening again. In other words, even if history falls behind in answering our questions about a specific matter, it still can narrow down our search to limited possible answers, thus reducing our effort and spent time on finding a reliable solution. To be more specific, in many cases, people in the past have used options that did not bring them success. So, we can use their experience and stop making the same mistake over and over again. Consequently, not only can reading their experiences reduce our risk of failure, but also it can save a lot of time and resources in our forage to find answers. For example, today, we are struggling with violence and local wars around the world. As we can observe in different ages, people have faced the same problems, such as those the world experienced during world wars. So, it can be an appropriate lesson for human beings to control their desires and violence to prevent large-scale catastrophes, as their devastating repercussions can remain with human beings for ages.
According to the reasons mentioned above, it is a foregone conclusion that people can use lessons they have learned from the past in order to shed on today's lives. Although the problems modern humans are dealing with are not apparently the same as those in the past, one can find the same roots while having a comprehensible study of humans' history.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easons to substantiate my perspective. To begin with, I contend that there are ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...resent and anticipate future problems. In addition, my conviction is that by re...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can remain with human beings for ages. According to the reasons mentioned above...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, however, if, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, in many cases, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00446428571 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61079428742 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529017857143 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.705653947 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.761904762 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90476190476 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124422418372 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471894206069 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594083644341 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992826929769 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547210692934 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.