The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Meaning of happiness is very different in various cultures. Some people may find it in maintaining permanent relationship with their spars and close friends, but some others may claim that the ability for finding new people is decisive. In my view, being happy in life is not restricted only to friends. there are many factors, which are more important than maintaining or finding friends. I feel this way for 2 main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, regarding the issue of having the ability to keeping relationships with old friends, one might suggest that it is not guarantied for having happier life. It may be because of having disability for finding new persons as friends. Even this fault may result to some kind of being not happy, frustration and even depression. For example, my brother has a limited number of friends. Having an introverted personality, he has many trouble for communicating with new people. As far as I remember, he has been alone in new places. As a result, maintaining old friend is not a great item for judging ones for being happy in their life.
Another aspect of having a happier life by social communications through our friends is not attention to other vital factors. There are many happy people, who have not many old or new friends. They pursue their important goals in life and with them are really pleasant. My personal experiment is a convincing example of this. I realy enjoy of reading book about chemistry, molecules, their interactions and other challenges of my major. I can do interesting experiment in my laboratory for hours and exchanging my ideas with others whom are interested in my field. It is no matter that I have old or new friends in my life. In fact, I prefer to spending time with my researches to wasting time with my probably friends in a coffee shop!
Overall, what drives some body to suggests that only maintaining old friends or finding new ones can not bring happiness to life, may fall into 2 basic categories including having certain disabilities or attention to other matters in life instead of friends. I hope each one finds his true happiness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...life is not restricted only to friends. there are many factors, which are more import...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of being not happy, frustration and even depression. For example, my brother has ...
^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun trouble seems to be countable; consider using: 'many troubles'.
Suggestion: many troubles
...ving an introverted personality, he has many trouble for communicating with new people. As f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 646, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spend'?
Suggestion: spend
...riends in my life. In fact, I prefer to spending time with my researches to wasting time...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 22, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'somebody'?
Suggestion: somebody
... coffee shop! Overall, what drives some body to suggests that only maintaining old f...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, really, regarding, so, for example, i feel, in fact, kind of, as a result, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84636118598 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7530126967 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517520215633 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.7794312718 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.619047619 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245311499242 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765860734961 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624737182216 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15562585354 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623285905644 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.