fossile of T. rex has remains of the actual tissues for studying more by scientists.
In this set of material, the reading passage is about 3 points which proves fossil of T. rex has remains of the real tissues for studying more by scientists. In the lecture, the professor cast doubt on the reasons mentioned in the reading passage.
Firstly, according to the reading passage small branching channels among fossilized leg bone of T. rex is due to blood vessels, and these organic materials help researcher to find many useful discoveries about them. The professor claims that bacterial colonization lived inside the bone and leaved organic material.
Second, the reading passage asserts that finding spheres in different parts of the inner bone shows which they are the remains of red blood cells. Specially they have dark red centers that are due to Iron as an important mineral in conveying oxygen to various tissues. In the other hand the professor says that not only are these events related to the other animals and have different origin but they also are due to reddish minerals.
Third, according to the reading discovering of collagen matrix in dinosaur leg bone reveals that they are some parts of bone tissue. However, the professor believes that collagen can not last longer as 70-million-year-old, and this may due to much more recent sources, such as human tissues. They are transferred on dinosaur leg bone when handling them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...s 70-million-year-old, and this may due to much more recent sources, such as human...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07555555556 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64403731693 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564444444444 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3834448445 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1666666667 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157094162092 0.272083759551 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785461497771 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190595651436 0.0662205650399 288% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117273887574 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145173905571 0.0443174109184 328% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.