TPO 31
The reading and the listening passage have a debate if fossil included a fine lines around the skeletal bones of Sinoosauropteryx are related to feathers or not. The writer puts forward 3 main hypotheses, which are refuted by following speaker.
Firstly, the writer suggests that The pattern of fine lines may not be related to feather of Sinosauropteryx; because some other parts of them such as their skins maigh have decomposed into fibers and became remained as lines in the volcanic ash. While, the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to professor, decomposition of skin into fibers can not take place in fossil, As a result, these events may due to other functional parts of them.
The second preposition has offered by the writer is that the researchers believe there is not any evidence which explains the lines are defiantly related to dinosaures. They may have been a part of their frills structures. However the speaker casts doubt on this assumption by saying that study of chemical composition of these marks shows beta-caroten that is observable only in feather structure and not other parts of their structure.
Last, the writer supposes that the feathers help animals for flying or controlling their body temperature, while these functions are not applicable for dinousoures. On contrary, the speaker holds an opposite view. The professor explains that feathers have some other function in some birds such as being colorful and attracting mat. So, their may be used for this kind of goals.
Overall, the ideas mentioned in the listening passage opposes the ideas in the reading passage in that the observed fine lines may represent feathers in Sinosauropteryx.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... remained as lines in the volcanic ash. While, the speaker views this issue from an o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of skin into fibers can not take place in fossil, As a result, these events may...
^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...been a part of their frills structures. However the speaker casts doubt on this assumpt...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, while, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18050541516 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82448469138 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552346570397 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2634186941 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.384615385 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317328150232 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101731507867 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841124000461 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172305231357 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507057955459 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.