The ability to maintain id a friendship with a few people is more important for happiness than the ability to make new friends easily. Do you agree or disagree?
The fact that friends bring us happiness is undeniable. Opinions are divided on whether having a small number of friends for a long period makes us happier or having the capability to make new friends. Personally, It is my conviction that making new friendships provide us with more happiness. I will develop my standpoint for two conspicuous reasons stated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first worthwhile mentioning reason is that we certainly do not access old friends in person every time and everywhere. Thereby, the ability to make new friends allows us to be happy no matter where we are. My personal experience of leaving my hometown to persuade my studies is a compelling example of this. Three years before now, I moved to Tehran, the Capital and most populated city of Iran, to graduate in my field of study. At first, leaving behind my all friends in my hometown, I was homesick since I was alone. Consequently, I came up with the idea to make some new friends getting together and having fun to relieve my stress of being alone and homesick. As a result, establishing some strong new friendships, homesickness was just a memory. Under no circumstances, did I manage to overcome my homesickness and have happy times if I did not make new friends.
The second significant point to champion my outlook is that the more we have friends, the more options have we to be happy with since every person has a unique personality and abilities. To be more specific, surrounding us with a limited number of old friends could become a boring routine activity with no new excitement. Back to my previous example, when I made more new friends in Tehran, I found it out that my new friends are completely different from my old friends, which allowed me to have more happiness because whatever I wanted to do I always had company to be with. For example, one of my new friends was a mountain climber such a happy activity, so did I that having a company makes it double. Had I made no new friend, I could not have such happiness that I have currently since none of my old friends is into mountains.
To wrap up what has been discussed, I reckon that making new friends brings us more happiness. This is because new friends not only are accessible anywhere at any time, but they also provide us with more options to be happy with.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... Opinions are divided on whether having a small number of friends for a long period makes us happ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'make'?
Suggestion: make
...all number of friends for a long period makes us happier or having the capability to ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'had' and 'company'.
Suggestion: had always company
...iness because whatever I wanted to do I always had company to be with. For example, one of my new ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, second, so, while, for example, i reckon, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6392251816 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74890605015 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4968631725 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.842105263 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7368421053 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249568681321 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984396829028 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595760317187 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183581298688 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268826516865 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.