Agree or disagree: to solve the problem of present and future, it is necessary to understand the past.
When people are facing a problem, it is important for them to listen to others advices. In this way, it can be a lot more efficient to solve the problem. People might ask, is it necessary to understand the past in order to solve the problem of present and future? Some people may think this is incorrect. However, I strongly agree with this statement shows in the prompt.
To begin with, if people understand the past, they can solve the problem of present and future in a more effective way. When people listen to others’ past experiences, they can use others idea to create their own method to solve a problem. For instance, in our studies, we always like to ask advices from others, who can help us to improve other studies such as our classmates our professors. For me, I like to ask others many questions, for example, what is the most efficient way to take note in the class or how can I improve my grade in the school. The advises others give me may not be always useful. However, after I listen to their experience, I can develop my own ways that is efficient and lead to the result of having a higher grade in school. As a result, people can save a lot of time when they listen to others’ past experiences. Indeed, by understanding the past can help people solve problems of present and future more effectively.
True, in some particular circumstances, relying on the past may lead to a serious problem because the idea in the pass are not always correct. However, lots of people still rely on the knowledge in the past in order to improve themselves and eventually perfected the old ideas. As a result, even though the knowledge in the past may not be exactly correct, people can still rely on it so they will not likely to make the same mistake. Thus, it is still necessary for people to understand the past in order them to solve all of the difficulties they are facing in the present or future.
Undoubtedly, some people may sat that understanding the past cannot solve the problem of present and future, because the problems are not likely to be exactly the same. However, I think even though the problems may not be the same, people can still use their idea to create their own method to solve the problem. As a result, the best way to solve the problem of present and future is to understand the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...way. When people listen to others' past experiences, they can use others idea to create the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 836, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...f time when they listen to others' past experiences. Indeed, by understanding the past can ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...erstand the past in order them to solve all of the difficulties they are facing in the pre...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51063829787 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54962319603 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.385342789598 0.524837075471 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6389093891 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.15 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342263797834 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143281442587 0.076458572812 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147827103502 0.0737576698707 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264180577528 0.150856017488 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806958146691 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.