agree or disagree with this statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Driving a car makes our life more convenient, therefore, some people are convinced that people would use more cars within twenty years. Nonetheless, I disagree with this statement. For what follows, this essay will explore a few points to explain my opinion.
First of all, most people will use more shared cars instead of using private cars in twenty years. City life has been changing as using more sharing services already. For instance, we can immediately book a shared car that is parked near me using an application, and we can easily drive it. The more we use sharing car services, we might feel that possessing our own car is not so necessary in modern life. I believe that this phenomenon will bring car industries to produce less cars.
Secondly, as advances in public transportation, the number of using private cars will decline in the future. Not only using the subway or bus but also we can see that people have been using public bikes and kickboards recently. Furthermore, the road for bikes also has developed for inviting public bike users more. This is very useful when we go not far away.
Last but not least, the voice of the media in terms of improving atmospheric quality has been impacting us. It affects people to use less private cars for protecting the environment. Especially, it warns people to use more public transportation than private vehicles.
To put it in a nutshell, despite the convenience of using cars, I strongly believe that people use fewer cars in the future. We already have begun to see new movements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...on will bring car industries to produce less cars Secondly as advances in public ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 52.1666666667 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1977.66487455 64% => OK
No of words: 266.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74812030075 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49950246618 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53007518797 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 266.0 20.1344086022 1321% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1263.0 100.406767564 1258% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 266.0 20.6045352989 1291% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 122.0 5.45110844103 2238% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31181192033 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.31181192033 0.076458572812 408% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182295738999 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722006327571 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 133.9 11.7677419355 1138% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -190.05 58.1214874552 -327% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 105.9 10.1575268817 1043% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.75 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 20.39 8.01818996416 254% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 10.002688172 540% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 108.4 10.0537634409 1078% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 54.0 10.247311828 527% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.