agree or disagree
the traditional encyclopedia are more accurate than the online one
In this set of materials, the reading and the lecture both discus whether or not the online encyclopedia have advantage in comparison to the written one. While the reading states that the online encyclopedia have many problems which reduce its value because it authored by the community of internet users. The lecture argues this by saying that it is true that the online encyclopedia not perfect but it is valuable according to what afford.
First and foremost, the reading claims that the online lack academic well trained experts that’s what makes it inaccurate. In contrast, the traditional one are done by professional trained people which have standard of academic knowledge. However, the lecture argues that the traditional encyclopedia are not perfect too. Acoording to the professor, the comprehensive neve be empty of any mistakes and this are never found. Furhtermore, the professor says that this mistakes are easily corrected in online form in contrast to the traditional one which the mistakes stay for decay.
Secondly, the reading makes the argument that the online entry are incorrect and there are many hackers whcich may effect the acurecy of the information and this things are never happened with the traditional. On the other hand, the lecture refutes this pint by saying that there was many method have been used to protect the information one, the crucial information and facts dispute only in formate which are reliable . Second, there are a groups of expert and specialist enders which reduce the changes that are malicious.
Lastly, the reading argues that the online encyclopedia are focus many times on popular topics which effect people decision negativelyabout the importance of the topics.While the traditional give an equal proportion of information abuot the topics. However, the lecture counters this claims by pointing out that the traditional have limit space so it cannot tell what is important and what is not and the academic report still represent in online. Moreove, the professor adds that the acurecy and diversity of subjects make it more used by people and this property onre of the strength advantage of online encyclopedia.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...the reading and the lecture both discus whether or not the online encyclopedia have advantage ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...t and there are many hackers whcich may effect the acurecy of the information and this...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...fect the acurecy of the information and this things are never happened with the trad...
^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the traditional. On the other hand, the lecture refutes this pint by saying that...
^^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun method seems to be countable; consider using: 'many methods'.
Suggestion: many methods
...utes this pint by saying that there was many method have been used to protect the informati...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ave been used to protect the information one, the crucial information and facts d...
^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...spute only in formate which are reliable . Second, there are a groups of expert an...
^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a group' or simply 'groups'?
Suggestion: a group; groups
... which are reliable . Second, there are a groups of expert and specialist enders which r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cision negativelyabout the importance of the topics.While the traditional give an...
^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...velyabout the importance of the topics.While the traditional give an equal proportio...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...velyabout the importance of the topics.While the traditional give an equal proportio...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, in contrast, in contrast to, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2664756447 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76733718618 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484240687679 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 3.08781362007 421% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0345617605 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.285714286 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 5.45110844103 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207907510997 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813328849828 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518739561663 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136277971989 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533957153516 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.