Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education' ultimate goal is to provide fundamental information and its strategic plane includes vision, mission, and outside-the-box thinking as a team. The curriculum always promotes the students forward to work as a team. Some people think working alone will be beneficial because it's less affected by negative Peoples that have less enthusiastic to deliver a high-quality project as they willing to just finish a task have been asked to do it. While others completely refute this perspective. In this essay, I will put forward a substantiated personal view that argues the teamwork will add information and sharpen our brains than do any task alone for several reasons.
To commence with, working on a project as a team will enhance our enthusiasm and increase a beneficial competition between the group. For instance, each person within the group has his own ideas and perspective view; therefore, this will encourage each person within the team to add from his knowledge and acquaints to bring the project its high quality. Eventually, any members within this group that have never share, he will try his best to become the active one and compete with his friends to prove his effectiveness to the team.
Moreover,teamwork will comsume less time to finish the project than doing it lonely. As each person will search in a different direction to collect all the materials for a project this will be effortless and finish the task within its due time. For instance, the teacher asks to work on a science project in my daughter school within a week. She with her friends come to my home at the same day and doing all together as each one of them finishes separate tasks, one collect the materials needed, other, bring the coloring pen until they start to put on the project to its final conclusion. They deliver it the next day. The teacher was impressive by their great job as well as their group spirit and encourage all other students to follow them.
In conclusion, although some people prefer to work separately on their tasks, others believe it is more beneficial and effective way to work within a team because this will be more enthusiastic, informative, and less time-consuming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 447, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...finish a task have been asked to do it. While others completely refute this perspecti...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'shared'.
Suggestion: shared
...mbers within this group that have never share, he will try his best to become the act...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , teamwork
...s effectiveness to the team. Moreover,teamwork will comsume less time to finish the pr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97282608696 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80463745555 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516304347826 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9711048803 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155837279016 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635352653899 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450686717352 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104707598378 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301422354505 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.