Agree or disagree .In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Cars are one of the most brilliant innovations of the twentieth century. It is thought by some people that cars would increase in upcoming years as a result of the population’s increase. However, I firmly believe that in the near future we will have only fewer cars in use. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
First of all, the number of cars will reduce in two decades because energy consumption is becoming a real problem. Many experts argue that we no longer would have enough fossil fuel available in the future. On top of that people tend to use more convenient forms of transportation such as uber and lyft, so that they do not want to worry about car problems that they might face while driving. Furthermore, since the price of fossil fuel will increase because of its scarcity, people would prefer not to spend money, so that they would rather take uber than drive their own cars. Overall, people would not use their cars anymore, but use other forms of transportation, which would help them to save money and approach toward their convenience.
Secondly, nowadays,people all over the world are aware of environmental issues that really have a huge impact on their well-being and health. Many people have started to take action to curtail the damages that have been done in recent decades. For example, the level of air pollution has drastically increased in the past few years, so citizens of different countries have found different ways to reduce the release of carbon dioxide in the air.Therefore, some people are already using only public transportation. Others are using carpooling or riding a bike instead of driving. Accordingly, the environmental problems, which are expanding on a global scale, have raised awareness everywhere. Thus, people are doing their best to not use cars which appears to be the major factor of polluting our environment.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that cars would be reduced in number in twenty years from now. This is because people do not want to waste their money on high prices of gasoline and because they want to protect their environment, so that they could be able to live a healthy life .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 717, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld help them to save money and approach toward their convenience. Secondly, n...
^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , people
...their convenience. Secondly, nowadays,people all over the world are aware of environ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...he release of carbon dioxide in the air.Therefore, some people are already using only pub...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hey could be able to live a healthy life .
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld be able to live a healthy life .
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, furthermore, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91711229947 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73360518973 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1169831321 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.176470588 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5882352941 5.45110844103 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18002115966 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659026319508 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552194558569 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119872799001 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035276406357 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.