Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The development of technology has positively impacted all generations of human beings. It is thought by some people that in the past people had more chances to become creative because of the time they had available. However, I believe that technology has really helped everyone include children to thrive in their favorite fields. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore as follows.
To begin with, it is crucial to mention the fact that nowadays children are differently developed than children in the past. This is as a result of the technology that is accessible to everyone. Having tools that are needed to encourage the creativity is one of the main factor of fast development, especially of children's capability of being creative.For instance, people in the past did not have many alternatives available to bust their creative work. My grandmother told me that it was very hard for her to find the tools that she needed to increase her children imagination and fuel their creativity. Today, she sees how my parents use the technology to encourage us to come up with new ideas and innovations. If my grandmother have had the tools that she thought would be effectively helpful, the generation of my parents would have been even more advanced and had a different opportunities. That is why technology has an important role in boosting children's creativity.
Secondly, young adults that have talent, but they are struggling to put it to the practice would have different options to approach their talent by using the developed high-tech products. Children who use the tools that are provided by the advanced technology would have the chance to think differently and come up with new and beautiful innovations. Actually, currently we have seen this happening. Young learners are thoroughly engaged on using the new technology as a high inspiring learning tool. For example, I have seen that my kids have completely changed after I bought them their own i-pads and instilling different creative programs. They were very happy and eager to learn new ideas, so they could come up with their own innovations. They did not need any teacher's assistance that was another beneficial thing, which helped me to reduce my payment for tutors. It is clear that children have become more creative with the development of technology.
Comments
Innovation is what propels…
Innovation is what propels technology; it's the process of coming up with fresh concepts, ideas, or products that can solve issues or open up new opportunities. Visit Here: Mangaa
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... childrens capability of being creative.For instance, people in the past did not ha...
^^^
Line 3, column 884, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'opportunity'?
Suggestion: opportunity
... even more advanced and had a different opportunities. That is why technology has an importan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to tool'
Suggestion: to tool
...technology as a high inspiring learning tool. For example, I have seen that my kids ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 768, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... own innovations. They did not need any teachers assistance that was another beneficial ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, i feel, in fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04909560724 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84422772746 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509043927649 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5480404279 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.842105263 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3684210526 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.10526315789 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170947651592 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617863701664 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447099718774 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122336798436 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174629506379 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.