Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A controversial issue relating to whether teachers should make their social and political views shared with their students or not, has brought to the attention of relevant people. Many adults believe that educators should not make their ideas public to their students. However, in my opinion, professors should bring up their views.
First of all, making personal views public to students, teachers could give them an insight which could help them to think differently. To put it in other words, teachers play an important role in representing new ideas of other minded people. Since educators fall in that category, they could easily express what they think about a particular topic, such as politics or other social concerns. For instance, three decades ago, when I was in university, I was curious to know about other individuals opinions. After I listened to my friends' and my professor' opinions, I was able to better shape my own thoughts. According to this experience, if educators share their views with their students, that will give them a chance to gather information from different perspectives and be able to create their own once.
Furthermore, expressing social and political views, is a good way of participating and showing that as a citizen, teachers could do their job well by contributing with their opinions and ideas in order to make the world a better place to live. For example, if everybody participate in important discussions such as rising their voice for social issues they face, students, who will listen to this opinions will have a chance to learn and understand different points of view. Moreover, people of different fields such as professors have a better position not only as a citizens, but also as professionals to express their opinion about different concerns that community or even the nation face. Overall, educators as citizens have an obligation to make their views known not only to their students in classroom, but also to their community. Therefore, rising the voice, will help to improve conditions where people live.
In conclusion, teachers should express their opinions to their students. This is because they are going to give their an insight, so they could create their own ideas. And because teachers as citizens have the obligation to be part of giving their perspective on different issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...they face, students, who will listen to this opinions will have a chance to learn an...
^^^^
Line 5, column 520, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...over, people of different fields such as professors have a better position not on...
^^
Line 5, column 568, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a citizen' or simply 'citizens'?
Suggestion: a citizen; citizens
...sors have a better position not only as a citizens, but also as professionals to express t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15143603133 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74145965381 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498694516971 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8205850584 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.058823529 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5294117647 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.94117647059 5.45110844103 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22886077229 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881426132526 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803623212467 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167472285436 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662275778944 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.