Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Generally speaking, it is important to learn about the past. It is thought by many people that only students who are interesting in the history courses should learn about it, rather than every one. In my opinion, learning history would help students to broaden their knowledge, and become better citizens.
First of all, universities should really take into consideration the fact that making history courses mandatory for students, regardless their preferences would be a good indicator of expanding student's knowledge. If universities do not put history in their curriculum then, young learners will not have a chance to know more about history. This is because they may pick other subjects, rather than history, so that the chance to get informed about what had happened in the past would be drastically reduced. For instance, two decades ago, when I was still a student, the classes that I choose were independent, so I never picked the history course. After I graduated, it happened that my new social circle loved to talk about the historic events. Being at that environment, actually I felt embarrassed because I had no clue about history. If I had taken any of the history classes that would have changed my contribution to the conversations, held by my friends. According to this experience, students should learn about history, so they would have a chance to broaden their background.
Another vivid viewpoint is that knowing the history of your country or even better the history of the entire world, students would become better citizens. For example, statistics have revealed that 87 percent of young adults, who had a general knowledge about the history of the world, they were proactive and understood the problems that the world is facing. In addition, they were capable of finding new solutions for different situations that appeared to be a repetition of the same past events. Therefore, these people were categorizes as citizens who gave their contribution to make the world the better place to live in. That is why universities should provide history classes for their students.
In conclusion, young adults should study history throughout their academic year. This is because they will be able to broaden their knowledge, and because they are going to be better citizens by contributing to their society and the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: BE_INTEREST_IN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'interested'?
Suggestion: interested
... many people that only students who are interesting in the history courses should learn abo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... than every one. In my opinion, learning history would help students to broaden t...
^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... would be a good indicator of expanding students knowledge. If universities do not put h...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r example, statistics have revealed that 87 percent of young adults, who had a ge...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, may, really, so, still, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14921465969 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75134377111 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502617801047 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1835679825 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.277777778 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193443225459 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699900348865 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533735735869 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126000961274 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237659256332 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.