Agree/disagree: people should spend time to try many jobs before they choose along-term job.
My high school teacher always have mentioned that each of us should be cautious about aspects of her life. It is crucial to Come up with a decision around which career is the best for individuals. When come to this point myriad of people think is better to try different jobs, while others believe that it is not a good idea. I do agree with later idea. I will explain my point of view through two reasons in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, it is chief issue that a person should be expert in his or her job. At the moment someone choose a job it means that s/he want to cover life expenses by what earns from it. Therefore, it is vital that through the time and gradually gain experience and provide better goods and services. Owing to high quality of what produced consumer satisfaction raised and more demands and orders will be received. Consequently, the person get much more higher salary. Assume a carpenter if s/he constantly stay in this job and focus on quality of wooden made in which way can improved, s/he would earn more money for his or her hand made. Thus, it is important maintain on a particular job to be well paid for it.
Secondly, make a decision and pick a long-term career and consistently follow it is chief one because if follow various job at the end may be come up with no job which win persons thought. Each and every job has its pons and cons. Trying to many jobs for short-term makes confusion that which job has more advantage among all s/he tried. As a result, for shallow information about those jobs, it is likely to choose none of them. For instance, a fresh high school student start to work part time and join start up group, library assistant, work as a tutor, accountant assistant, etc. By the graduation probably, not having depth information about those jobs, h/she will give up on choosing one of them. Indeed, is important to be consist in one job.
To wrap everything up, everybody need a job for living, and it is crucial to make money for covering expenses. By come up with a job and follow it through years not only these crucial need will be cover, but also become expert in career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'chooses'.
Suggestion: chooses
...n his or her job. At the moment someone choose a job it means that s/he want to cover ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...someone choose a job it means that s/he want to cover life expenses by what earns fr...
^^^^
Line 4, column 444, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...ived. Consequently, the person get much more higher salary. Assume a carpenter if s/he cons...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 502, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'stays'.
Suggestion: stays
.... Assume a carpenter if s/he constantly stay in this job and focus on quality of woo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...fresh high school student start to work part time and join start up group, library assist...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51413881748 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41628014482 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542416452442 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9673336001 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.619047619 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5238095238 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04761904762 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220371510843 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661100621872 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584791788021 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123342187907 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591600295798 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.