Tpo40
In the reading, the author claims that it is possible for human that inhabitant on moon or mars permanently but owing to harsh and inhospitable condition of venues, it is unlikely for human to maintain. however, finding all ideas questionable the lecturer has different view point about pint of view and presents some evidence to the contrary.
Firstly, the passage claims that atmosphere pressure of venues is much higher than earth. it argues that, as a result roughly all materials might be landed on venues would be damaged.0conversly, the lecturer states that pressure on 50 kilometers above venues surface is same as earth pressure and space station can place safely.
Secondly, the passage asserts that no water reservoirs are available on venues planet and the atmosphere hardly contain oxygen instead have carbon dioxide. this contradict the lecturer which states it could be possible that use carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid through a chemical process and generate water for station.
Lastly, the passage argues that very little sun ray’s reach the venues surface because of thick clouds which reflecting the sun ray and carbon dioxide layers and which reflecting the sun ray. Therefore, solar panels cannot generate power for station equipment. however, the lecture states that it is not big issue. this is supported by the assertion that 50 kilometers above the venues clouds are not that much dense thus solar cell can generate power for station also reflected sun ray by clouds can be used for that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
..., it is unlikely for human to maintain. however, finding all ideas questionable the lec...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sents some evidence to the contrary. Firstly, the passage claims that atmosph...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...re of venues is much higher than earth. it argues that, as a result roughly all ma...
^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'venues'' or 'venue's'?
Suggestion: venues'; venue's
...at no water reservoirs are available on venues planet and the atmosphere hardly contai...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ain oxygen instead have carbon dioxide. this contradict the lecturer which states it...
^^^^
Line 9, column 267, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...t generate power for station equipment. however, the lecture states that it is not big ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 321, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ecture states that it is not big issue. this is supported by the assertion that 50 k...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21457489879 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60491631563 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558704453441 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5953857274 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.8 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222946976883 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849407751959 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507351451884 0.0662205650399 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136981784645 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450963848025 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.