Agree or disagree: News sources in the past were more concerned about the accuracy of the news compared to the news sources today.
Publics all around the globe seek news sources that are unbiased in their coverage of information. Should journals describe fact-based events and give a real explanation of the world, they maintain their audiences; indeed, accuracy is one of the most important issues with which almost all the journalists accord. hen it comes to this point, journals/news sources wonder how accurate their news sources are. A common idea is that previous news sources put a higher value on reliability of their information than these days’ sources. I personally repudiate it. In the ensuing lines, I will discuss two outstanding reasons to elaborate my response.
The first reason coming to mind is that journalism is a highly competitive business at present. Since the explosion of information has been concomitant with the technological development, people have the modern equipment and easy access to a number of different kinds of information (including documents, media, publications, etc.); individuals are simply and quickly able to monitor and evaluate different sources of reports, and choose the most credible ones to follow. For example, researches have shown that these days above 70% of individuals own a mobile phone through which they can examine the accuracy of items, whereas in the past, large and bulky mobile phones considered luxury objects. Thence, in the present climate, existing publications have to overcome several authoritative competitors to retain their followers.
The second reason that shows nowadays there is more concern about the validity of the news is that there exist strict laws against fraud news. At the present time, information is everywhere, but journalism has a particular authority; whatever we have been recently faced with in mass media, it has been verified by a group of professionals. Therefore, news services are experiencing the constraint of strict laws at present. They vigilantly make sure that their reports are accurate and the authority is content with the unbiased coverage of the events and issues. In fact, the more reliable the news , the more credit the news sources obtain, and the more audiences are attracted. Although past reports were being monitored by experts, today’s technologies, such as modern available software, make the authentication process more expeditious and easier.
To wrap everything up in the end, having analyzed the preceding ideas, one can conclude that news sources are more concerned about the accuracy of their reports these days than before. This is because not only today’s is journalism a highly competitive business but also it is under serious observation. Thus, I believe that news services are more watchful about their reports at the present circumstances.
Score: 26-27
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hen
...hich almost all the journalists accord. hen it comes to this point, journals/news s...
^^^
Line 4, column 601, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ues. In fact, the more reliable the news , the more credit the news sources obtain...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2346.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44315545244 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93364765782 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559164733179 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 736.2 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.690351414 48.9658058833 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.473684211 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6842105263 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363451596772 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108675857101 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12454566812 0.0737576698707 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232233466299 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112312848475 0.0645574589148 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.