amnsmans
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
It has been my pleasure to work with Sadeer Sbahi over the past two years. As my dental assistant, I had noticed she was highly qualified in helping patients and made a great effort to address the patient condition as quickly as required, we worked together in the (ABC clinic) and because of her caring and confident demeanor, she was promoted to head dental assistant.
Since she took the role of lead assistant at the beginning of March 2016, she was considerate, obedient, self-dependent and worked with confidence, excellent communication skills, she always cooperated efficiently and collaborated effectively with all the staff members, Her positive outlook and pleasing personality improved her leadership qualities.
She showed a great skill as a dental assistant and had exceptional knowledge as a dentist. She was a very professional and qualified individual who had that combination of a positive attitude and the belief that she could always improve in any aspect she put her mind into.
Sadeer brought smiles not only to her patients but to other team members with her pleasant character, I had really enjoyed seeing the passion in her eyes, as well as the enthusiasm that was obvious in her work. I am glad to have such a dental assistant who impressed me every time I worked with her.
I strongly recommend Sadeer because I am confident that she will be an outstanding student at your school.
Please contact me whenever you have questions at (773)338-2161 or (reemnasir@yahoo.com)
Best regard,
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN It has been my pleasure to work with ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Best'.
Suggestion: The Best
...773338-2161 or reemnasir@yahoo.com Best regard,
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, really, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 253.0 407.700716846 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11067193676 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01376077148 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604743083004 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 618.680645161 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.8744446527 48.9658058833 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.666666667 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1111111111 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.