In areas where there are many restaurants, some people prefer to buy their meals in restaurants very frequently, rather than cooking and eating meals at home. Other people prefer to cook most of their meals at home and only rarely eat in a restaurant. Which one would you choose and why?
There is a controversial debate about whether people should spend their time cooking in modern society. Some people believe that in this modern world time have become more precious than before, so people should not waste it on kitchen while they can offer any kind of food from restaurants. However, personally, I am of the belief that cooking at home could be more beneficial for people because not only is it healthier than restaurant food, but also it makes economic sense.
The first illustration which can demonstrate my opinion is that home-cooked meals can be healthier and contain a decent amount of vital minerals and vitamins. As people care about themselves, they are cautious to not use harmful ingredients in their meal, they try to use fresh ingredients instead. However, restaurants' meals always have a high level of sugar, salt, and oil. These ingredients could cause negative effects on the digestive system, in order, resulted in serious diseases like obesity or heart attack. The more amount of salt a person uses, the more chance of heart attack for him. So people should be careful about their diets if they want to live for a long time. By cooking at home, they can control the number of harmful ingredients in their food. It is possible that their food is not as delicious as outdoor's meals, but it is certainly healthier.
Also, it cannot go unnoticed that eating at home can be cost effective. To elucidate more, eating at the restaurant or outdoors casts a lot, and people have to pay for a meal more than its value. For instance, a sandwich which can cost 5 dollars if it is cooked at home, is 15 dollars in the restaurant. This is because the restaurant has to pay its rent, salaries to its employees, and so forth. So it is obvious that it should be more expensive than home-cooked meals. In addition, there are some other costs which should a person eat outdoors, he should pay. To give a good example, consider a case in which a person decides to eat his meal at a fancy restaurant. He should first pay for a parking lot if he uses his personal vehicle, or pay for public transportation, and he should pay for tips.
In the light of above-mentioned reasons, I am a proponent of the idea that people should cook their meals as much as possible. I feel this way because not only it is healthier, but also they can save more money in this unfavorable economic situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There is a controversial debate about wh...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d, but also it makes economic sense. The first illustration which can demonst...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eals, but it is certainly healthier. Also, it cannot go unnoticed that eating...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtation, and he should pay for tips. In the light of above-mentioned reasons,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, as to, for instance, i feel, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67924528302 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65213496352 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48820754717 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5245535632 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4761904762 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1904761905 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312542850038 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104242827996 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682007291739 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196843086252 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330441140002 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.