Asked what the most eager objective is to modern people while working, the response of almost all must be a boilerplate answer: the success. Although some people claim that for success in a future job, the ability to study hard in school is really counts,

Essay topics:

Asked what the most eager objective is to modern people while working, the response of almost all must be a boilerplate answer: the success. Although some people claim that for success in a future job, the ability to study hard in school is really counts, in my opinion, relating well to people is more important.

To begin with, relating well can bring to a successful cooperation. One thing we feel about is when we are facing disagreement in the teamwork. You can not assume the solution would come to you by itself while cooperating. Therefore, relating well to people usually can solve such problems successfully without wasting the amount of time, on the contrary, study-hard people would feel puzzle and just waiting for the solution from others. Team member also can get close in relationship with the presence of relating well which will never happen to hard study blindly.

Aside from, an in-depth cause, perhaps just as significant, is that relating well people are more easy to reach a new reality with strangers. Depending on a study from the university of Tokyo, about 79-percent of experiments, suggests that the man who is doing well in dealing with people's relationship can work more outstandingly in several projects with a pure stranger than others. There is no doubt that team-working is more powerful than respected two. And working with strangers is hard to avoid. Relating well to people can make them a small team, generate more ideas and strength.

Admittedly, hard working in one's school life seems make him rich of knowledge. However, that does not mean the ability to relate well to people takes the second place. Nowadays, team-working is essential to everyone rather than working alone. Cooperation makes a team all-round developed. The other members can fill up your drawbacks easily.

This is my answer that- that let those who have been told for so long by so many to be cynical, and fearful, and doubtful about whether the ability to relate well to people is more important to put their hands on the arc of history and bend it once more for a better day. If there is anyone who still wonders whether the ability of relate well can bring a successful cooperation, and anyone who still argues that the ability to relate well can get achievement easily with strangers, and anyone who still doubts if the ability to relate well can fill up drawbacks, this essay will be my answer.

Asked what the most eager objective is to modern people while working, the response of almost all must be a boilerplate answer: the success. Although some people claim that for success in a future job, the ability to study hard in school is really counts, in my opinion, relating well to people is more important.

To begin with, relating well can bring to a successful cooperation. One thing we feel about is when we are facing disagreement in the teamwork. You can not assume the solution would come to you by itself while cooperating. Therefore, relating well to people usually can solve such problems successfully without wasting the amount of time, on the contrary, study-hard people would feel puzzle and just waiting for the solution from others. Team member also can get close in relationship with the presence of relating well which will never happen to hard study blindly.

Aside from, an in-depth cause, perhaps just as significant, is that relating well people are more easy to reach a new reality with strangers. Depending on a study from the university of Tokyo, about 79-percent of experiments, suggests that the man who is doing well in dealing with people's relationship can work more outstandingly in several projects with a pure stranger than others. There is no doubt that team-working is more powerful than respected two. And working with strangers is hard to avoid. Relating well to people can make them a small team, generate more ideas and strength.

Admittedly, hard working in one's school life seems make him rich of knowledge. However, that does not mean the ability to relate well to people takes the second place. Nowadays, team-working is essential to everyone rather than working alone. Cooperation makes a team all-round developed. The other members can fill up your drawbacks easily.

This is my answer that- that let those who have been told for so long by so many to be cynical, and fearful, and doubtful about whether the ability to relate well to people is more important to put their hands on the arc of history and bend it once more for a better day. If there is anyone who still wonders whether the ability of relate well can bring a successful cooperation, and anyone who still argues that the ability to relate well can get achievement easily with strangers, and anyone who still doubts if the ability to relate well can fill up drawbacks, this essay will be my answer.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 29, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ength. Admittedly, hard working in ones school life seems make him rich of know...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, really, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, no doubt, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2019.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90048543689 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5960879576 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526699029126 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.8558257649 48.9658058833 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.263157895 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6842105263 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307663526138 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104521502547 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169227333638 0.0737576698707 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248749681576 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.310669982023 0.0645574589148 481% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.