Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.
In the modern era, most people want to do so many tasks together but they cannot do their best which make them frustrated. While, some believe that human beings could do better under pressure, the others hold the opposite perspective. I think people cannot do their best when they want to do so many different tasks together. There are so many noticeable reasons for this claim some of which will be explained below.
To begin with, having so many tasks to do make the concentration hard, thus, the efficiency would decrease. For doing each thing in the perfect way, you should focus on it. However, when you have other tasks, you cannot easily focus. As a result, you cannot put all your effort into doing one specific thing. For example, when I was in high school, I had so many tasks on Sunday night. Because, I usually spent all the weekend playing with my friends or going out, so I was obliged to do all my tasks on Sunday night. As there were lots of tasks, I became confused. When I was doing one assignment, I had stress because of other tasks. In the end, I decided to do my tasks every day, so this way, I just needed to focus on one task. It really helps me do my best for my assignments. It illustrates that doing so many tasks together decreases the quality.
In addition to concentration, physical energy has an important role. Doing so many tasks together makes you use a great deal of energy which will make you feel tired. Maybe, you do well at first, but obviously for leftover tasks you are not as well as the beginning. If you do just one task not only you do it in the best way but also you will not be tired. A recent survey on this topic in my company indicates that employee who had lots of different tasks each day; perform their job poorly in the evening as they are so tired. Being tired make it less possible to do well.
Last but not the least, when you always do different things, you would not have enough time to be professional at one of them, and consequently, you would not do very well. For being an expert in one job you should spend a lot of times just on it so that you learn how to best at it. For instance, when I wanted to be a football player, I spent the whole summer just playing football, in the end, I become a good player.
In brief, while some contend that they act better, when they have lots of tasks, I think most people would not act perfectly by doing so many things. Because they will not have enough energy and concentration to do all the tasks in a flawless way. I recommend that people should put their time and energy just for one task each time to make it perfect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...t do their best when they want to do so many different tasks together. There are so many notic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a flawless way" with adverb for "flawless"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y and concentration to do all the tasks in a flawless way. I recommend that people should put the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, really, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in brief, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2134.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.30241935484 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28659609948 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431451612903 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.878140372 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.037037037 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3703703704 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.59259259259 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361102197559 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121656842649 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906216072077 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233992830874 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648323543944 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 11.7677419355 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 58.1214874552 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.66 10.9000537634 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.