Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Some people think that people now are more happy or more satisfied than people were in the past because of the presense of technology and advancement in civilization. However, I disagree with the view and think that people now are less happy and less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past because of the following reasons.
First of all, people now are less happy and less satisfied becasue of the social media. Almost all the people have social media account and they spend their significant time on it. Since social media enables people to view other people's activites, that is making people less satisfied about their own life. For example, one consider that all the pictures and fun activites posted on other's facebook timeline are actually the true mirror of them. But, in reality, it may not be the case. Last time when I posted a picture in front of the car, my friends were speculating that that car was acutally mine personal car. However, in truth, that care was one of my friend's. My friends saw that and they were actually comparing me and they were saying to me that you are very lucky than us. In contrast to the present, due to the absense of social media, this was not happening in the past. People were simply busy at their work in the past and the tradition of comparison and competion amont other people were considerable low
Second of all, people now are less happy and less satisfied becasue of the increased urban life. For example, in these last few century, the population living in the urban area has risen a lot. Since urban life expensive, people always have to work must of the time in order to support their family. Eventually, people don't have time to spend with their firends. As a result they are less happy. For example, I live in a city where the housing and transportantion is very expensive. In order to afford my personal expense, I work most of the time and rarely hang out with my firends. As a result, I always feel stressed. Notwithstanding in the past, most of the people used to live in the village and had enough time to hang around with their friends and family. As a result, people were more happy in the past.
In conclusion, due to the above two reasons, human life has become less happy than people were in the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 125, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun century seems to be countable; consider using: 'few centuries'.
Suggestion: few centuries
... urban life. For example, in these last few century, the population living in the urban are...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 250, Rule ID: MUST_OF_THE_TIME_MOST_OF_THE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'most of the time'?
Suggestion: most of the time
...e expensive, people always have to work must of the time in order to support their family. Event...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 320, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...upport their family. Eventually, people dont have time to spend with their firends. ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecome less happy than people were in the past.
^^
Line 8, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss happy than people were in the past.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59124087591 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35923680602 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433090024331 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9405947878 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7727272727 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6818181818 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.532046404884 0.236089414692 225% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164659701474 0.076458572812 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173418154444 0.0737576698707 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.395240958105 0.150856017488 262% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138171864753 0.0645574589148 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.