Celebrities such as actors musicians and athletes etc sometimes express their political views in public Some people appreciate knowing the political views of celebrities others think it is not appropriate or useful to know the political views of celebriti

Essay topics:

Celebrities (such as actors, musicians and athletes, etc.) sometimes express their political views in public. Some people appreciate knowing the political views of celebrities, others think it is not appropriate or useful to know the political views of celebrities. Which opinion do you agree with?

Nowadays, people listen more and more to famous people in certain area such as art, music or sport. These so-called celebrities have the potential to guide societies to a worse or perhaps a better paths. In this matter, while some people believe that political views of such people should be kept to themselves, other believe that expressing these ideas can be pretty useful. Personally speaking, I subscribe to the former view. I have several reasons for my belief which I will explore in the following essay.

First and foremost, Information provided by celebrities is, by and large, misleading. To be specific, with vast specialization and improvement of human knowledge in general, more and more experts are available in each major. Especially, in the case of politicial views, students put many hours of effort to gain a valuable insight to comprehend their materials and courseworks. Hence, this helps them to understand which side they should be on in every political argument. However, in case of non-aware celebrities, who perhaps decided about the subject based on their feelings rather than objective reasoning, this is completely the opposite; consequently, they will provide the society with wrong information which may lead to more drastic outcomes in the long run.

Furthermore, expressing politicial views is not good for celebrities either. To explain more, people are somehow divided in political matters, each believing one idea or another. Everyone thinks they are more near to the ground truth; as a result, when they figure out the arguments of differenet side, they would become hostile to the very person rather than listening to their points of view objectively. This is since we are not taught appropriate skills in schools and uninversities, instead focusing on irrelevant compulsary coursework. With this in mind, people who do not have the right skills develop a sense of hatred toward everyone who does not agree with them. Celebrities are no exception to this. Ultimately with saying their political views in the public, they risk their income and also their life since most of their income indirectly comes from their fans.

In sum, with all these takes into account, I do believe that stating political views for celebrities is not a wise choice on the ground that it leads people to take a wrong path and also it is extremely bad for their publicity.

Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...uch people should be kept to themselves, other believe that expressing these idea...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, while, in general, such as, as a result, by and large

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13846153846 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7658526404 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5489813061 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277255605572 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852560027256 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704788621652 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175879446182 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688214633007 0.0645574589148 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.