A university recognized first-year students have poor study skills in its university. Some in the university believe the best way to address this is to ask all first-year students have to pass course on study skills. Others don't agree with this requirement. What is your opinion?
Nowadays, The demand to know is more than anytime in the history of human beings. Therefore, more and more people are using efficient methods of learning, many of which require learning study skills. One of the issues regarding these skills is whether it should be mandatory for all junior students to study them or not. While some people believe it is best if students learn such skills beforehand, others disagree. Both of them have their advantages and disadvantages. However, I subscribe to the idea of requiring all students to pass such a course. I have several reasons to support my argument, among which reducing stress and expanding social circle are more considerate.
The first and foremost reason is that a course that teaches us how to study reduces fear of study itself. Consequently, it provides us a more positive attitude toward every other course, whether taught formally in university or informally in business, such as weakly workshops. This enables us to comprehend everything in the rest of life better. A great woman, whose name eludes me at the moment, once said, "Knowledge is power. Use it to your benefit." I remember lacking study skills when I was in my second year of university. Everyone seemed to understand the lectures better. However, I was pretty wrong not to see that comprehension skills are to be acquired. Where is the world is a better place to learn such skills?
Second, incorporating low-demand courses such as study skills can help students get to know their peers better, resulting in expansion of their social circle, making them more suitable for getting hired afterward. Moreover, since anyone is required to pass the course, all the students would be starting at the same level, and no one would experience high pressure. In addition, time management skills, which are definitely a part of the curriculum, will be improved. Thus, if students use this very skill appropriately, they would be able to spend much more time with their family, which again tightens the family bonds.
In summary, with all this taken into account, I do believe that incorporating a course which will improve students' study skills is much more critical on the grounds that it would lead to establishing valuable connections, and, more importantly, it can reduce the stress of newcomers who do not know much about university. Lastly, I think if universities take these matters more seriously, it will benefit us all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to study'
Suggestion: to study
...earning, many of which require learning study skills. One of the issues regarding the...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 351, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...em or not. While some people believe it is best if students learn such skills beforehan...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, lastly, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, in addition, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09135802469 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82672809244 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567901234568 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5620313166 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1904761905 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298431170496 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775538483517 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054545331094 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17439167996 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240731144928 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.