A city wants to help teachers of its high school students (age14-18) improve their teaching. It is considering two plans.
1. Choose a small group of excellent teachers; these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to teach effectively, and they will then come back to their schools and provide that training for other teachers in school.
2. Provide additional training in teaching effectively for high school teachers, using online material that each teacher will study individually.
My farther always clearly remembers the day in his career. When he shared limited additional training methods with all the attending classes and even some of training ways cost a lot of energies to get it. However, the day with worrying about the traditional training method brings several problems is past. Today, development of network technology improves the quality of training, and simultaneously, allows us to train in more convenient modes.
To begin with, it’s not deniable that offline class has one or two downwards. For instance, those who attend a class to train to improve the distributive quality of education to return to other teachers by experts face to face, of that it can make notes and many interactions that it may be missed some important information with long-term of mental focus. However, in light of the above-mentioned conditions, from a person suggests that teachers use online material to enhance their teaching method by an individual. It is because online material can play thousands of times in the computer as long as you want, and people can easily to understand every detail corner of class. Thus, the method makes the class much more clearer.
Secondly, compared with a way of a small excellent group separates to other teachers of real classes, online material is very convenient way for people learning with a Wifi, as in coffee, bar, subway, at home, no matter where you are. Since people invented computer that support of fast network technology, people can use maximally the advanced technology to deal advantage of any classes for any individual. On the contrary, the traditional training is hardly that convenient of reasonable distribution and advanced technology, and it is almost never to reach that point without advantage of technology. Thus, taking the online material of training is the best way for goal of school to each teacher to study.
Finally, compared with a way of a small excellent group to separate other teachers of real classes, online material is very convenient way for learning and can save much more time. Specially, the large time of people go to take a subway, take public transport means or drive private car attend class on their ways. Meanwhile, people can use this the kind of time to take online class that is too much enough for them and save some time to do other things in their life. Contrary, if people go to attend classes by face to face and it takes a lot of time on their ways, even worst, people may be caught in a traffic jam or unpredictable reasons, that’s can not be to account of the time of spend. Thus, I guess people will undoubtedly choose the online material to train for each teacher in that high school.
In short, online material of separation of training should be much better. I believe in that it can save large time and bring great convenient advantages, as above mentioned. Why not?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'improving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: improving
...ance, those who attend a class to train to improve the distributive quality of education t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
...ducation to return to other teachers by experts face to face, of that it can make notes...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, even so, for instance, i guess, in short, kind of, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2410.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 492.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89837398374 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68356422584 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483739837398 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 753.3 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5095573787 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224801862701 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683220494328 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616240635951 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117681951694 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592730637284 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.