Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are different from your own or presented by people whose views are similar to your own?
It is commonly understood that people keep their personal similar viewpoints, which is beneficially and importantly to concentrate their unique mind in diversified though whatever they read the news. However, there are more important factors to benefit way one’s significance. From person of perspective, how well they could watch the news presented by people in their distinctive opinions and viewpoints based on the following reasons.
To begin with, watching the news in different opinions that people can way expand knowing of horizons of resources of the events, which people can easily and clearly obtain great benefit distinctive thought in their mind. My friend Elva, she crazily loves to read the books of photography by Susan writer. One day, thanks to she reads other various books of photography, she really realized that a new door of knowledge was opened, and she got a lot of fresh knowledge points in the experienced to explore different views from before primary narrow-minded, which means a lot to her. Finally, she changed her primary mind to read ways of various views. So, obviously, reading the different resources can surely expand a personal field of new knowledge.
Additionally, compared with single personal viewpoint, watching the differing views that more surely opens mind, which can help people to have some judgments from the biased diversified thought of people. As we all know, if people want to acquire different knowledge of views, they must explore to through more different resources on books and watch TV or other media, which can figure out that what is different from their own single way and how is biased and diversified in the same news. On the contrary, if people always watch the resources on a single similar way, which means they could not acquire the different opinions from outside the world, so as to they hardly to have the ability of distinguishability on justified stance and certain issues. Thus, watching diverse opinions is better than the one.
Finally, holding differing views of resources to read is clearly to benefit trust of events. As everybody knew that everything have two sides, or even more. If people read diverse the news of opinions, which can acquires different angular perspectives in the same event, and people can obtain the comprehensive information, thereby, people can more objectively and fairly analyze the whole event. So that, it is obviously know that people can benefit to obtain trust of event. On the contrary, if people only read the similar views that only obtain the same angular information, and sometime people will miss some points, so as to they cannot acquire the entire information to estimate event. So, it is a good way for reading with diverse opinions from the news.
In the nutshell, according above mentioned the reasons that it is beneficial for people to read or watch from the divers dissenting perspectives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 653, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ferent opinions from outside the world, so as to they hardly to have the ability of dist...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'acquire'
Suggestion: acquire
...diverse the news of opinions, which can acquires different angular perspectives in the s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 423, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...e whole event. So that, it is obviously know that people can benefit to obtain trust...
^^^^
Line 4, column 623, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... sometime people will miss some points, so as to they cannot acquire the entire informat...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, really, so, thus, well, as to, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2443.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13235294118 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7465199363 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453781512605 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.0 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.4537793128 48.9658058833 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.578947368 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0526315789 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275951738329 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921592183113 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525467583177 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165321414525 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326583613931 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.