A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The given prompt states that a company is going to give money to support arts or to protect the environment. As per the common human prespective, the art is one of the most important asset of life. And we also know that environment is in danger due to the human activities. Though some people like to give money to support the art but according to my point of view money given by the company should be used to protect the environment.
First, the money can be given to any non-profit organization whose main agenda is to save the environment. This money can be used to plant more trees as the deforestation increases day by day. One average aged tree can produce a large amount of oxygen during photosynthesis process which can be used by the other organism to respire. Air pollution is also increasing day by day due to which very hazardous diseases are spreading across entire planet. Also, increasing number of trees will reduce the soil erosion process due to which natural calamities like drought will not affect the human life.
Secondly, these money can be used to fund an awareness program whose main aim is to aware people about the deadly consequences of environmental pollution. These type of programs should be take place inside the schools, collegesand offices to make people more aware and also provide essential steps to avoid them. By performing this type of activities will provide awareness among people. This funds can also be used in some sort of cleaniness program like cvleaning a beach or cleaning a barren land. Let's take an live example of most densly populated city Mumbai, India in which there is beach used by people to throw garbage and other tourists stuff. Slowly a retired man from Indian army taken initiative to clean the beach after that many people funded and participated in this social movement and cleaned that beach.
Aditionally, this money by the company can be given to small vendors or merchants who still uses plastic bags or polyethene bags. This plastic bags areof low cost as compared to paper bags or any other organic material. So to create awareness about causes of plastic bags in pollution will be very benificial and we can use them paper bags on very low cost. In this way, the small vendors and merchants will be very wise about using the material.
To sum up, many examples were provided that proved that themoney given by company can be used by people to stop the causes of environmental pollution. Thus, we can conclude that money should be spent on the noble purpose of stopping environmental pollution as compared to support to arts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 11, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
... affect the human life. Secondly, these money can be used to fund an awareness progra...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 502, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ning a beach or cleaning a barren land. Lets take an live example of most densly pop...
^^^^
Line 9, column 512, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ch or cleaning a barren land. Lets take an live example of most densly populated c...
^^
Line 9, column 823, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...social movement and cleaned that beach. Aditionally, this money by the company c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, sort of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82405345212 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57596045082 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483296213808 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8416075631 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.142857143 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.380952381 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21246363067 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778570650714 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109475503284 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148401075629 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120767645684 0.0645574589148 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.