Ever since we are born in this world, we have been learning our entire life. When we were infants, we learned how to walk and eat. And also today when we are adults, our learning has never stopped.
We are learning something new every day to tackle our life. Learning is a great way to improve our knowledge and we can learn either from reading books or work practically. Some people believe that learning by reading books is more effective rather than learning by doing. However, I believe that learning by doing is a better way.
To begin with, learning by doing helps us learn better. When we solely read books and try to learn, we could never understand the fundamentals. By performing we can get better meaning and practical knowledge which is far better than simply scamming the book. We can remember better with practical leaning since we are practically implementing the subject thereby we can remember much better. On the other hand, learning with books we are more likely to forget what we read. For instance, when I was attending my dental anatomy classes during my undergraduate in dental school, I could never understand because our professor would simply read from the textbook. However, I could understand much better when my professor would teach us to show everything in human cadaver during the practical classes. Thus, I understood my subject so well that I always do a practical study rather than merely reading a book. There is no doubt, there are more examples, but my story clearly shows the importance of studying practically.
What's more, studying by doing or working is always intriguing. Whereas, studying by reading a book is boring and time taking. Although, I believe that we can learn a lot and gain sufficient information with books yet texts are boring and difficult to understand. Again, the example my undergraduate days, when I was in the third year, before we treat patients, we have to practice dental tooth models. Thus, It always fascinated me that root canal treatment on the dental models is an awesome way to learn. I could perform much better simply working on it. Had I been just reading books and directly treating patients without practical knowledge, I would not be confident and interested. This my practical knowledge has a huge role in keeping my goals and aims focused than just reading books.
All in all, I would always prefer studying by doing than by reading books because I can learn and remember much better and practical works keeps me motivated. I suggest that more practical work should be taught to students due to its effectiveness and advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... with, learning by doing helps us learn better. When we solely read books and try to l...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 670, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... simply read from the textbook. However, I could understand much better when my p...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... importance of studying practically. Whats more, studying by doing or working is a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, third, thus, well, whereas, for instance, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2176.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88988764045 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62746124267 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480898876404 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5774012442 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6923076923 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1153846154 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255231411673 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101111930907 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088144459186 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181848210251 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788575164696 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.